Paper detail

A high resolution spectroscopic atlas of M subdwarfs - Effective temperature and metallicity

Context. M subdwarfs are metal poor and cool stars. They are important probes of the old galactic populations. However, they remain elusive due to their low luminosity. Observational and modeling efforts are required to fully understand their physics and to investigate the effects of metallicity in their cool atmospheres. Aims. We perform a detailed study of a sample of subdwarfs to determine their stellar parameters and constrain the stat-of-the art atmospheric models. Methods. We present UVES/VLT high resolution spectra of three late-K subdwarfs and 18 M subdwarfs. Our atlas covers the optical region from 6400 AA up to the near infrared at 8900 AA. We show spectral details of cool atmospheres at very high resolution (R= 40 000) and compare with synthetic spectra computed from the recent BT-Settl atmosphere models. Results. Our comparison shows that molecular features (TiO, VO, CaH), and atomic features (Fe I, Ti I, Na I, K I) are well fitted by current models. We produce an effective temperature versus spectral type relation all over the subdwarf spectral sequence. Thanks to the high resolution of our spectra, we perform a detailed comparison of line profiles of individual elements such as Fe I, Ca II, Ti I, and are able to determine accurate metallicities of these stars. These determinations contribute to calibrate the relation between metallicity and molecular band strength indices from low-resolution spectra. Conclusions. This work shows that the new generation of models are able to reproduce various spectral features of M subdwarfs. Working with these high resolution spectra allowed us to disentangle the atmospheric parameters (effective temperature, gravity, metallicity), which is not possible when using low resolution spectroscopy or photometry.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access7 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.