Paper detail

A Hierarchical Spike-and-Slab Model for Pan-Cancer Survival Using Pan-Omic Data

Pan-omics, pan-cancer analysis has advanced our understanding of the molecular heterogeneity of cancer, expanding what was known from single-cancer or single-omics studies. However, pan-cancer, pan-omics analyses have been limited in their ability to use information from multiple sources of data (e.g., omics platforms) and multiple sample sets (e.g., cancer types) to predict important clinical outcomes, like overall survival. We address the issue of prediction across multiple high-dimensional sources of data and multiple sample sets by using exploratory results from BIDIFAC+, a method for integrative dimension reduction of bidimensionally-linked matrices, in a predictive model. We apply a Bayesian hierarchical model that performs variable selection using spike-and-slab priors which are modified to allow for the borrowing of information across clustered data. This method is used to predict overall patient survival from the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) using data from 29 cancer types and 4 omics sources. Our model selected patterns of variation identified by BIDIFAC+ that differentiate clinical tumor subtypes with markedly different survival outcomes. We also use simulations to evaluate the performance of the modified spike-and-slab prior in terms of its variable selection accuracy and prediction accuracy under different underlying data-generating frameworks. Software and code used for our analysis can be found at https://github.com/sarahsamorodnitsky/HierarchicalSS_PanCanPanOmics/ .

preprint2021arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.