Paper detail

A Halász-type theorem for permutation anticoncentration

Given a set $A=\{a_1,\ldots,a_n\}$ of real numbers and real coefficients $b_1,\ldots,b_n$, consider the distribution of the sum obtained by pairing the $a_i$'s with the $b_i$'s according to a uniformly random permutation. A recent theorem of Pawlowski shows that as soon as the coefficients are not all equal, this distribution is always spread out at scale $n^{-1}$: no single value can occur with probability larger than $\frac{1}{2\lceil n/2\rceil + 1}$, and this bound is sharp in general. We show that stronger anticoncentration holds when the coefficients have additional diversity. We quantify the structure of the coefficient multiset by a simple statistic depending on its multiplicity profile, and prove that the maximum point mass of the permuted sum decays polynomially faster as this statistic grows. In particular, when the coefficients are all distinct we obtain a bound of $n^{-5/2+o(1)}$, which can be regarded as an analogue of a classical theorem of Erdős and Moser.

preprint2026arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.