Paper detail

A Guaranteed Convergence Analysis for the Projected Fast Iterative Soft-Thresholding Algorithm in Parallel MRI

The boom of non-uniform sampling and compressed sensing techniques dramatically alleviates the lengthy data acquisition problem of magnetic resonance imaging. Sparse reconstruction, thanks to its fast computation and promising performance, has attracted researchers to put numerous efforts on it and has been adopted in commercial scanners. To perform sparse reconstruction, choosing a proper algorithm is essential in providing satisfying results and saving time in tuning parameters. The pFISTA, a simple and efficient algorithm for sparse reconstruction, has been successfully extended to parallel imaging. However, its convergence criterion is still an open question. And the existing convergence criterion of single-coil pFISTA cannot be applied to the parallel imaging pFISTA, which, therefore, imposes confusions and difficulties on users about determining the only parameter - step size. In this work, we provide the guaranteed convergence analysis of the parallel imaging version pFISTA to solve the two well-known parallel imaging reconstruction models, SENSE and SPIRiT. Along with the convergence analysis, we provide recommended step size values for SENSE and SPIRiT reconstructions to obtain fast and promising reconstructions. Experiments on in vivo brain images demonstrate the validity of the convergence criterion. Besides, experimental results show that compared to using backtracking and power iteration to determine the step size, our recommended step size achieves more than five times acceleration in reconstruction time in most tested cases.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.