Paper detail

A gravitational lensing explanation for the excess of strong Mg-II absorbers in GRB afterglow spectra

GRB afterglows offer a probe of the intergalactic medium out to high redshift which complements observations along more abundant quasar lines-of-sight. Although both quasars and GRB afterglows should provide a-priori random sight-lines through the intervening IGM, it has been observed that strong Mg-II absorbers are twice as likely to be found along sight-lines toward GRBs. Several proposals to reconcile this discrepancy have been put forward, but none has been found sufficient to explain the magnitude of the effect. In this paper we estimate the effect of gravitational lensing by galaxies and their surrounding mass distributions on the statistics of Mg-II absorption. We find that the multi-band magnification bias could be very strong in the spectroscopic GRB afterglow population and that gravitational lensing can explain the discrepancy in density of absorbers, for plausibly steep luminosity functions. The model makes the prediction that approximately 20%-60% of the spectroscopic afterglow sample (i.e. ~ 5-15 of 26 sources) would have been multiply imaged, and hence result in repeating bursts. We show that despite this large lensing fraction it is likely that none would yet have been identified by chance owing to the finite sky coverage of GRB searches. We predict that continued optical monitoring of the bright GRB afterglow locations in the months and years following the initial decay would lead to identification of lensed GRB afterglows. A confirmation of the lensing hypothesis would allow us to constrain the GRB luminosity function down to otherwise inaccessibly faint levels, with potential consequences for GRB models.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.