Paper detail

A Global Analysis of Pre-Earthquake Ionospheric Anomalies

Local ionospheric density anomalies have been reported in the days prior to major earthquakes. This global study statistically investigates whether consistent ionospheric anomalies occur in the 24 hours prior to earthquakes across different regions, magnitudes, temporal and spatial scales. We match earthquake data to Total Electron Content (TEC) data from 2000-2020 at a higher resolution and cadence than previous assessed. Globally, no significant, consistent anomaly is found. Regionally, statistically significant ionospheric anomalies arise in the 12 hours prior to earthquakes with $p \leq 0.01$ following Wilcoxon tests. For the Japanese region we find a median negative ionospheric anomaly of around 0.5 TECU between 3 and 8 hours before earthquakes. For the South American region, the median TEC is enhanced by up to ~ 2 TECU, between 7 and 10 hours before an event. We show that the results are robust to different definitions of the ''local'' region and earthquake magnitude. This demonstrates the promise of monitoring the ionosphere as part of a multimodal earthquake forecasting system.

preprint2024arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access8 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.