Paper detail

A giant elliptical galaxy with a lightweight initial mass function

We present new VLT observations of the closest-known strong-lensing galaxy, the sigma=330 km/s giant elliptical ESO325-G004. The low redshift of the lens (z_lens=0.035) results in arcs being formed at a small fraction of the effective radius, (R_Ein ~ R_Eff/4). At such small radii, stars dominate the lensing mass, so that lensing provides a direct probe of the stellar mass-to-light ratio, with only small corrections needed for dark matter. The redshift of the galaxy lensed by ESO325-G004 was unknown until now, so the lensing mass was not securely determined. Using X-SHOOTER, we measure a secure source redshift of z_src=2.141. Combined with the lensing configuration, this yields a total mass inside the Einstein radius of (1.50+/-0.06) 10^11 M_sun. We estimate the range of possible contribution of dark matter to the lensing mass, using statistics from cosmological N-body simulations. Subtracting this component yields a stellar M/L ratio for the lens of 3.14^+0.24_-0.42 (M/L)_sun (in F814W band). Using VIMOS, we have also obtained very high-S/N spectroscopy for the lens galaxy. The VIMOS data confirm that ESO325-G004 has a very old stellar population. For a Kroupa IMF, the stellar population fit yields a predicted stellar M/L ratio of 3.01+/-0.25 (M/L)_sun. Hence the mass attributable to stars with this IMF is consistent with the lensing estimate. By contrast, a Salpeter or heavier IMF is disfavoured at the 99.8% confidence level. A "heavyweight" IMF, with a mass twice as large as the Kroupa case, is firmly excluded. Such an IMF has been proposed for more distant elliptical lenses, and also to explain strong dwarf-star spectral features, in particular the NaI 8200-Ang doublet. A FORS2 far-red spectrum shows that this feature is as strong in ESO325-G004 as it is in other high-sigma ellipticals, suggesting tension between dwarf-star indicators and lensing-mass constraints for this galaxy.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.