Paper detail

A Georgi-Machacek Interpretation of the Associate Production of a Neutral Scalar with Mass around 151 GeV

Following an investigation of several indications for new physics from LHC data, a detailed exploration of the Georgi-Machacek (GM) model was elaborated in a previous publication. This framework is used here to interpret the findings of Crivellin et al., which were obtained by combining the 2 photon mass spectrum from ATLAS and CMS, adding extra conditions, the most efficient one being the presence of >90 GeV missing transverse energy. The claim is a ~5 s.d. excess at 151 GeV. The GM model naturally explains this as coming from the cascade A(400)->H(151)Z, where H(151) is an isosinglet predicted by GM and where the accompanying signal comes from the decay of a Z boson into neutrino pairs. Satisfying the constraints from LHC measurements of the ZWW channel, which can receive a large contribution from this cascade, suggests that H(151) could dominantly decay into two light CP-odd scalars, following an ATLAS indication for h(125) decaying into bbmumu. A spectacular occurrence of signals is predicted at an $e^+e^-$ collider operating up to 1 TeV, an energy sufficient to cover the whole scenario.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.