Paper detail

A geometric definition of Gabrielov numbers

Gabrielov numbers describe certain Coxeter-Dynkin diagrams of the 14 exceptional unimodal singularities and play a role in Arnold's strange duality. In a previous paper, the authors defined Gabrielov numbers of a cusp singularity with an action of a finite abelian subgroup $G$ of ${\rm SL}(3,\CC)$ using the Gabrielov numbers of the cusp singularity and data of the group $G$. Here we consider a crepant resolution $Y \to \CC^3/G$ and the preimage $Z$ of the image of the Milnor fibre of the cusp singularity under the natural projection $\CC^3 \to \CC^3/G$. Using the McKay correspondence, we compute the homology of the pair $(Y,Z)$. We construct a basis of the relative homology group $H_3(Y,Z;\QQ)$ with a Coxeter-Dynkin diagram where one can read off the Gabrielov numbers.

preprint2013arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.