Paper detail

A Generic Approach to Quantitative Verification

This thesis is concerned with quantitative verification, that is, the verification of quantitative properties of quantitative systems. These systems are found in numerous applications, and their quantitative verification is important, but also rather challenging. In particular, given that most systems found in applications are rather big, compositionality and incrementality of verification methods are essential. In order to ensure robustness of verification, we replace the Boolean yes-no answers of standard verification with distances. Depending on the application context, many different types of distances are being employed in quantitative verification. Consequently, there is a need for a general theory of system distances which abstracts away from the concrete distances and develops quantitative verification at a level independent of the distance. It is our view that in a theory of quantitative verification, the quantitative aspects should be treated just as much as input to a verification problem as the qualitative aspects are. In this work we develop such a general theory of quantitative verification. We assume as input a distance between traces, or executions, and then employ the theory of games with quantitative objectives to define distances between quantitative systems. Different versions of the quantitative bisimulation game give rise to different types of distances, viz.~bisimulation distance, simulation distance, trace equivalence distance, etc., enabling us to construct a quantitative generalization of van Glabbeek's linear-time--branching-time spectrum. We also extend our general theory of quantitative verification to a theory of quantitative specifications. For this we use modal transition systems, and we develop the quantitative properties of the usual operators for behavioral specification theories.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.