Paper detail

A generalized mixed model framework for assessing fingerprint individuality in presence of varying image quality

Fingerprint individuality refers to the extent of uniqueness of fingerprints and is the main criteria for deciding between a match versus nonmatch in forensic testimony. Often, prints are subject to varying levels of noise, for example, the image quality may be low when a print is lifted from a crime scene. A poor image quality causes human experts as well as automatic systems to make more errors in feature detection by either missing true features or detecting spurious ones. This error lowers the extent to which one can claim individualization of fingerprints that are being matched. The aim of this paper is to quantify the decrease in individualization as image quality degrades based on fingerprint images in real databases. This, in turn, can be used by forensic experts along with their testimony in a court of law. An important practical concern is that the databases used typically consist of a large number of fingerprint images so computational algorithms such as the Gibbs sampler can be extremely slow. We develop algorithms based on the Laplace approximation of the likelihood and infer the unknown parameters based on this approximate likelihood. Two publicly available databases, namely, FVC2002 and FVC2006, are analyzed from which estimates of individuality are obtained. From a statistical perspective, the contribution can be treated as an innovative application of Generalized Linear Mixed Models (GLMMs) to the field of fingerprint-based authentication.

preprint2014arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.