Paper detail

A Generalized Matching Reconfiguration Problem

The goal in {\em reconfiguration problems} is to compute a {\em gradual transformation} between two feasible solutions of a problem such that all intermediate solutions are also feasible. In the {\em Matching Reconfiguration Problem} (MRP), proposed in a pioneering work by Ito et al.\ from 2008, we are given a graph $G$ and two matchings $M$ and $M&#39;$, and we are asked whether there is a sequence of matchings in $G$ starting with $M$ and ending at $M&#39;$, each resulting from the previous one by either adding or deleting a single edge in $G$, without ever going through a matching of size $< \min\{|M|,|M&#39;|\}-1$. Ito et al.\ gave a polynomial time algorithm for the problem. In this paper we introduce a natural generalization of the MRP that depends on an integer parameter $Δ\ge 1$: here we are allowed to make $Δ$ changes to the current solution rather than 1 at each step of the {transformation procedure}. There is always a valid sequence of matchings transforming $M$ to $M&#39;$ if $Δ$ is sufficiently large, and naturally we would like to minimize $Δ$. We first devise an optimal transformation procedure for unweighted matching with $Δ= 3$, and then extend it to weighted matchings to achieve asymptotically optimal guarantees. The running time of these procedures is linear. We further demonstrate the applicability of this generalized problem to dynamic graph matchings. In this area, the number of changes to the maintained matching per update step (the \emph{recourse bound}) is an important quality measure. Nevertheless, the \emph{worst-case} recourse bounds of almost all known dynamic matching algorithms are prohibitively large, much larger than the corresponding update times. We fill in this gap via a surprisingly simple black-box reduction: Any dynamic algorithm for maintaining [...]

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.