Paper detail

A generalization of Tverberg's Theorem

The well know theorem of Tverberg states that if n > (d+1)(r-1) then one can partition any set of n points in R^d to r disjoint subsets whose convex hulls have a common point. The numbers T(d,r) = (d + 1)(r - 1) + 1 are known as Tverberg numbers. Reay asks the following question: if we add an additional parameter k (1 < k < r+1) what is the minimal number of points we need in order to guarantee that there exists an r partition of them such that any k of the r convex hulls intersect. This minimal number is denoted by T(d,r,k). Reay conjectured that T(d,r,k) = T(d,r) for all d,r and k. In this article we prove that this is true for the following cases: when k > [ (d+3)/2 ]-1 or when d < rk/(r-k)-1 and for the specific values d = 3; r = 4; k = 2 and d = 5; r = 3; k = 2.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.