Paper detail

A Generalised Differential Framework for Measuring Signal Sparsity

The notion of signal sparsity has been gaining increasing interest in information theory and signal processing communities. As a consequence, a plethora of sparsity metrics has been presented in the literature. The appropriateness of these metrics is typically evaluated against a set of objective criteria that has been proposed for assessing the credibility of any sparsity metric. In this paper, we propose a Generalised Differential Sparsity (GDS) framework for generating novel sparsity metrics whose functionality is based on the concept that sparsity is encoded in the differences among the signal coefficients. We rigorously prove that every metric generated using GDS satisfies all the aforementioned criteria and we provide a computationally efficient formula that makes GDS suitable for high-dimensional signals. The great advantage of GDS is its flexibility to offer sparsity metrics that can be well-tailored to certain requirements stemming from the nature of the data and the problem to be solved. This is in contrast to current state-of-the-art sparsity metrics like Gini Index (GI), which is actually proven to be only a specific instance of GDS, demonstrating the generalisation power of our framework. In verifying our claims, we have incorporated GDS in a stochastic signal recovery algorithm and experimentally investigated its efficacy in reconstructing randomly projected sparse signals. As a result, it is proven that GDS, in comparison to GI, both loosens the bounds of the assumed sparsity of the original signals and reduces the minimum number of projected dimensions, required to guarantee an almost perfect reconstruction of heavily compressed signals. The superiority of GDS over GI in conjunction with the fact that the latter is considered as a standard in numerous scientific domains, prove the great potential of GDS as a general purpose framework for measuring sparsity.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.