Paper detail

A General Verification for Functional Completeness by Abstract Operators

An operator set is functionally incomplete if it can not represent the full set $\lbrace \neg,\vee,\wedge,\rightarrow,\leftrightarrow\rbrace$. The verification for the functional incompleteness highly relies on constructive proofs. The judgement with a large untested operator set can be inefficient. Given with a mass of potential operators proposed in various logic systems, a general verification method for their functional completeness is demanded. This paper offers an universal verification for the functional completeness. Firstly, we propose two abstract operators $\widehat{R}$ and $\breve{R}$, both of which have no fixed form and are only defined by several weak constraints. Specially, $\widehat{R}_{\geq}$ and $\breve{R}_{\geq}$ are the abstract operators defined with the total order relation $\geq$. Then, we prove that any operator set $\mathfrak{R}$ is functionally complete if and only if it can represent the composite operator $\widehat{R}_{\geq}\circ\breve{R}_{\geq}$ or $\breve{R}_{\geq}\circ\widehat{R}_{\geq}$. Otherwise $\mathfrak{R}$ is determined to be functionally incomplete. This theory can be generally applied to any untested operator set to determine whether it is functionally complete.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.