Paper detail

A General Preprocessing Method for Improved Performance of Epipolar Geometry Estimation Algorithms

In this paper a deterministic preprocessing algorithm is presented, whose output can be given as input to most state-of-the-art epipolar geometry estimation algorithms, improving their results considerably. They are now able to succeed on hard cases for which they failed before. The algorithm consists of three steps, whose scope changes from local to global. In the local step it extracts from a pair of images local features (e.g. SIFT). Similar features from each image are clustered and the clusters are matched yielding a large number of putative matches. In the second step pairs of spatially close features (called 2keypoints) are matched and ranked by a classifier. The 2keypoint matches with the highest ranks are selected. In the global step, from each two 2keypoint matches a fundamental matrix is computed. As quite a few of the matrices are generated from correct matches they are used to rank the putative matches found in the first step. For each match the number of fundamental matrices, for which it approximately satisfies the epipolar constraint, is calculated. This set of matches is combined with the putative matches generated by standard methods and their probabilities to be correct are estimated by a classifier. These are then given as input to state-of-the-art epipolar geometry estimation algorithms such as BEEM, BLOGS and USAC yielding much better results than the original algorithms. This was shown in extensive testing performed on almost 900 image pairs from six publicly available data-sets.

preprint2015arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.