Paper detail

A General Model for the CO-H2 Conversion Factor in Galaxies with Applications to the Star Formation Law

The most common means of converting an observed CO line intensity into a molecular gas mass requires the use of a conversion factor (Xco). While in the Milky Way this quantity does not appear to vary significantly, there is good reason to believe that Xco will depend on the larger-scale galactic environment. Utilising numerical models, we investigate how varying metallicities, gas temperatures and velocity dispersions in galaxies impact the way CO line emission traces the underlying H2 gas mass, and under what circumstances Xco may differ from the Galactic mean value. We find that, due to the combined effects of increased gas temperature and velocity dispersion, Xco is depressed below the Galactic mean in high surface density environments such as ULIRGs. In contrast, in low metallicity environments, Xco tends to be higher than in the Milky Way, due to photodissociation of CO in metal-poor clouds. At higher redshifts, gas-rich discs may have gravitationally unstable clumps which are warm (due to increased star formation) and have elevated velocity dispersions. These discs tend to have Xco values ranging between present-epoch gas-rich mergers and quiescent discs at low-z. This model shows that on average, mergers do have lower Xco values than disc galaxies, though there is significant overlap. Xco varies smoothly with the local conditions within a galaxy, and is not a function of global galaxy morphology. We combine our results to provide a general fitting formula for Xco as a function of CO line intensity and metallicity. We show that replacing the traditional approach of using one constant Xco for starbursts and another for discs with our best-fit function produces star formation laws that are continuous rather than bimodal, and that have significantly reduced scatter.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.