Paper detail

A Gaussian process limit for the self-normalized Ewens-Pitman process

For an integer $n\geq1$, consider a random partition $Π_{n}$ of $\{1,\ldots,n\}$ into $K_{n}$ partition sets with $K_{r,n}$ partition subsets of size $r=1,\ldots,n$, and assume $Π_{n}$ distributed according to the Ewens-Pitman model with parameters $α\in]0,1[$ and $θ>-α$. Although the large-$n$ asymptotic behaviors of $K_{n}$ and $K_{r,n}$ are well understood in terms of almost sure convergence and Gaussian fluctuations, much less is known about the asymptotic behavior of $P_{r,n}=K_{r,n}/K_n$ and of the self-normalized Ewens-Pitman process $(P_{1,n},P_{2,n},\dots)$. Motivated by the almost sure convergence of $(P_{1,n},P_{2,n},\dots)$ to the Sibuya distribution $p_α=(p_α(1),p_α(2),\ldots)$, where $p_α(r)$ is the probability mass at $r=1,2,\ldots$, we establish the $\ell^{2}$ distributional convergence \begin{displaymath} \sqrt{K_{n}}((P_{1,n},\,P_{2,n},\ldots)-p_α)\underset{n\rightarrow+\infty}{\overset{\cL}{\longrightarrow}}\mathcal{G}(Γ_α), \end{displaymath} where $\mathcal{G}(Γ_α)$ stands for a centered Gaussian process with covariance matrix $Γ_α=diag(p_α) - p_α p_α^T$. We apply our result to the estimation of the parameter

preprint2026arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.