Paper detail

A Gap No More: Mechanism for Non-Nuclear Energy to Fill in the Black Hole Mass Gap

Standard stellar evolution models predict that black holes in the range of approximately $50 - 140 M_\odot$ should not exist directly from stellar evolution. This gap appears because stars with masses between 100 and 240 $M_\odot$ are expected to undergo a pair instability supernova and leave behind no remnant, or a pulsational pair instability supernova and leave behind a remnant much smaller than their initial stellar mass. However, black holes have been discovered by the LIGO/Virgo collaboration within this mass range. In previous work (arXiv:2010.00254), we used the stellar evolution code MESA to show that the addition of non-nuclear energy (such as from annihilation of dark matter) could alter the evolution of a 180 $M_\odot$ star so that the observed black holes could be produced from isolated stars. In this paper, we extend this analysis to stars of other masses, and find that sufficient amounts of non-nuclear energy can allow any star to avoid pair instability, and could produce a black hole of mass comparable to the initial stellar mass. In addition, we produce examples of the type of black hole initial mass function that can be produced from this mechanism. These illustrative examples suggest that adding non-nuclear energy to stars offers a way to fully close the mass gap.

preprint2023arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.