Paper detail

A Gap between Simulation and Practice for Recursive Filters: On the State Transition Noise

In order to evaluate and compare different recursive filters, simulation is a common tool and numerous simulation models are widely used as 'benchmark'. In the simulation, the continuous time dynamic system is converted into a discrete-time recursive system. As a result of this, the state indeed evolves by Markov transitions in the simulation rather than in continuous time. One significant issue involved with modeling of the system from practice to simulation is that the simulation parameter, particularly e.g. the state Markov transition noise, needs to match the iteration period of the filter. Otherwise, the simulation performance may be far from the truth. Unfortunately, quite commonly different-speed filters are evaluated and compared under the same simulation model with the same state transition noise for simplicity regardless of their real sampling periods. Here the note primarily aims at clarifying this problem and point out that it is very necessary to use a proper simulation noise that matches the filter's speed for evaluation and comparison under the same simulation model.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.