Paper detail

A Game Theoretic Analysis of LQG Control under Adversarial Attack

Motivated by recent works addressing adversarial attacks on deep reinforcement learning, a deception attack on linear quadratic Gaussian control is studied in this paper. In the considered attack model, the adversary can manipulate the observation of the agent subject to a mutual information constraint. The adversarial problem is formulated as a novel dynamic cheap talk game to capture the strategic interaction between the adversary and the agent, the asymmetry of information availability, and the system dynamics. Necessary and sufficient conditions are provided for subgame perfect equilibria to exist in pure strategies and in behavioral strategies; and characteristics of the equilibria and the resulting control rewards are given. The results show that pure strategy equilibria are informative, while only babbling equilibria exist in behavioral strategies. Numerical results are shown to illustrate the impact of strategic adversarial interaction.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.