Paper detail

A game comonadic account of Courcelle and Feferman-Vaught-Mostowski theorems

Game comonads, introduced by Abramsky, Dawar and Wang, and developed by Abramsky and Shah, give a categorical semantics for model comparison games. We present an axiomatic account of Feferman-Vaught-Mostowski (FVM) composition theorems within the game comonad framework, parameterized by the model comparison game. In a uniform way, we produce compositionality results for the logic in question, and its positive existential and counting quantifier variants. Secondly, we extend game comonads to the second order setting, specifically in the case of Monadic Second Order (MSO) logic. We then generalize our FVM theorems to the second order case. We conclude with an abstract formulation of Courcelle's algorithmic meta-theorem, exploiting our earlier developments. This is instantiated to recover well-known bounded tree-width and bounded clique-width Courcelle theorems for MSO on graphs.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.