Paper detail

A Galaxy Model from 2MASS Star Counts in the Whole Sky Including the Plane

We use the star counts model of Ortiz & Lépine (1993) to perform an unprecedented exploration of the most important galactic parameters comparing the predicted counts with the 2MASS observed star counts in the J, H and K_S bands for a grid of positions covering the whole sky. The comparison is made using a grid of lines-of-sight given by the HEALPix pixelization scheme. The resulting best fit values for the parameters are: (2120 +- 200) pc for the radial scale length and (205 +- 40) pc for the scale height of the thin disk, with a central hole of (2070_{-800}^{+2000}) pc for the same disk; (3050 +- 500) pc for the radial scale length and (640 +- 70) pc for the scale height of the thick disk; (400 +- 100) pc for the central dimension of the spheroid, (0.0082 +- 0.0030) for the spheroid to disk density ratio, and (0.57 +- 0.05) for the oblate spheroid parameter.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.