Paper detail

A further extension to the group of Ginsparg-Wilson (overlap) chiral symmetries

As shown by Mandula, the Ginsparg-Wilson lattice realisation of chiral symmetry has a possible ambiguity: there is no unique lattice chiral symmetry, but an infinite group of symmetries with non-commuting generators. The physical implications of this abundance of symmetry remain unclear. In recent work, it has been shown how these chiral symmetries for overlap fermions can be derived from a renormalisation group blocking in the continuum, transforming the action from the standard continuum action to an equivalent to the lattice overlap action. There is no unique blocking, and different blockings lead to different chiral symmetries. The group of symmetries found by Mandula immediately follows. In this way, the excess chiral symmetry on the lattice can be explained in terms of different renormalisation schemes. The previous work suffered from one technical challenge: there is no continuum analogue of the lattice chiral eigenvectors at eigenvalue $2/a$. As the construction of the overlap operator required a mapping between lattice and continuum eigenvalues, the lack of a continuum counterpart to the doublers of the zero modes creates an ambiguity in the construction. Although the lattice chiral symmetry can still be defined, this leads to difficulties when considering $\mathcal{CP}$ symmetry on the lattice. In this work, we investigate the possibility of resolving this ambiguity by adding a second fermion field to the original continuum action used as a basis of the renormalisation group blockings. This second fermion field has a mass of the order of the momentum cut-off, to simulate the effects of the fermion doublers. Working through the same renormalisation group procedure to map this action to the lattice overlap action yields additional Ginsparg-Wilson relations satisfied by the overlap operator, and more (non-commuting) lattice chiral symmetries.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.