Paper detail

A Fundamental Limit of Distributed Hypothesis Testing Under Memoryless Quantization

We study a distributed hypothesis testing setup where peripheral nodes send quantized data to the fusion center in a memoryless fashion. The \emph{expected} number of bits sent by each node under the null hypothesis is kept limited. We characterize the optimal decay rate of the mis-detection (type-II error) probability provided that false alarms (type-I error) are rare, and study the tradeoff between the communication rate and maximal type-II error decay rate. We resort to rate-distortion methods to provide upper bounds to the tradeoff curve and show that at high rates lattice quantization achieves near-optimal performance. We also characterize the tradeoff for the case where nodes are allowed to record and quantize a fixed number of samples. Moreover, under sum-rate constraints, we show that an upper bound to the tradeoff curve is obtained with a water-filling solution.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.