Paper detail

A Fully Polynomial Parameterized Algorithm for Counting the Number of Reachable Vertices in a Digraph

We consider the problem of counting the number of vertices reachable from each vertex in a digraph $G$, which is equal to computing all the out-degrees of the transitive closure of $G$. The current (theoretically) fastest algorithms run in quadratic time; however, Borassi has shown that this probl m is not solvable in truly subquadratic time unless the Strong Exponential Time Hypothesis fails [Inf. Process. Lett., 116(10):628--630, 2016]. In this paper, we present an $\mathcal{O}(f^3n)$-time exact algorithm, where $n$ is the number of vertices in $G$ and $f$ is the feedback edge number of $G$. Our algorithm thus runs in truly subquadratic time for digraphs of $f=\mathcal{O}(n^{\frac{1}{3}-ε})$ for any $ε> 0$, i.e., the number of edges is $n$ plus $\mathcal{O}(n^{\frac{1}{3}-ε})$, and is fully polynomial fixed parameter tractable, the notion of which was first introduced by Fomin, Lokshtanov, Pilipczuk, Saurabh, and Wrochna [ACM Trans. Algorithms, 14(3):34:1--34:45, 2018]. We also show that the same result holds for vertex-weighted digraphs, where the task is to compute the total weights of vertices reachable from each vertex.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.