A full complexity dichotomy for immanant families

preprint2021arXivOpen access

Abstract

Given an integer n≥1n\geq 1 and an irreducible character χλχ_λ of SnS_{n} for some partition λλ of nn, the immanant immλ:Cn×n→C\mathrm{imm}_λ:\mathbb{C}^{n\times n}\to\mathbb{C} maps matrices A∈Cn×nA\in\mathbb{C}^{n\times n} to immλ(A)=∑π∈Snχλ(π)∏i=1nAi,π(i)\mathrm{imm}_λ(A)=\sum_{π\in S_{n}}χ_λ(π)\prod_{i=1}^{n}A_{i,π(i)}. Important special cases include the determinant and permanent, which are the immanants associated with the sign and trivial character, respectively. It is known that immanants can be evaluated in polynomial time for characters that are close to the sign character: Given a partition λλ of nn with ss parts, let b(λ):=n−sb(λ):=n-s count the boxes to the right of the first column in the Young diagram of λλ. For a family of partitions ΛΛ, let b(Λ):=max⁡λ∈Λb(λ)b(Λ):=\max_{λ\inΛ}b(λ) and write Imm(Λ)(Λ) for the problem of evaluating immλ(A)\mathrm{imm}_λ(A) on input AA and λ∈Λλ\inΛ. If b(Λ)<∞b(Λ)<\infty, then Imm(Λ)(Λ) is known to be polynomial-time computable. This subsumes the case of the determinant. On the other hand, if b(Λ)=∞b(Λ)=\infty, then previously known hardness results suggest that Imm(Λ)(Λ) cannot be solved in polynomial time. However, these results only address certain restricted classes of families ΛΛ. In this paper, we show that the parameterized complexity assumption FPT ≠\neq #W[1] rules out polynomial-time algorithms for Imm(Λ)(Λ) for any computationally reasonable family of partitions ΛΛ with b(Λ)=∞b(Λ)=\infty. We give an analogous result in algebraic complexity under the assumption VFPT ≠\neq VW[1]. Furthermore, if b(λ)b(λ) even grows polynomially in ΛΛ, we show that Imm(Λ)(Λ) is hard for #P and VNP. This concludes a series of partial results on the complexity of immanants obtained over the last 35 years.

Explore this paper’s authors, topics and related work.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Reviews 0

Write a reviewWrite

No reviews yet.

Discussion 0

Add a commentWrite

No comments yet.