Paper detail

A fresh look into m_{c,b} and precise f_{D_(s),B_(s)} from heavy-light QCD spectral sum rules

Using recent values of the QCD (non-) perturbative parameters given in Table 1 and an estimate of the N3LO QCD perturbative contributions based on the geometric growth of the PT series, we re-use QCD spectral sum rules (QSSR) known to N2LO PT series and including all dimension-six NP condensate contributions in the full QCD theory, for improving the existing estimates of {m}_{c,b} and f_{D_(s)}, f_{B_(s)} from the open charm and beauty systems. We especially study the effects of the subtraction point on "different QSSR data" and use (for the first time) the Renormalization Group Invariant (RGI) scale independent quark masses in the analysis. The estimates [rigourous model-independent upper bounds within the SVZ framework] reported in Table 8: f_D/f_π=1.56(5)[< 1.68(1)], f_B/f_π=1.58(5)[< 1.80(3)] and f_{D_s}/f_K= 1.58(4) [< 1.63(1)], f_{B_s}/f_K=1.50(3)[< 1.61(3.5)], which improve previous QSSR estimates, are in perfect agreement (in values and precisions) with some of the experimental data on f_{D,D_s} and on recent lattice simulations within dynamical quarks. These remarkable agreements confirm both the success of the QSSR semi-approximate approach based on the OPE in terms of the quark and gluon condensates and of the Minimal Duality Ansatz (MDA) for parametrizing the hadronic spectral function which we have tested from the complete data of the J/ψand Υsystems. The values of the running quark masses m_c(m_c)=1286(66) MeV and m_b(m_b)= 4236(69) MeV from M_{D,B} are in good agreement though less accurate than the ones from recent J/ψand Υsum rules.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.