Paper detail

A Framework to Map VMAF with the Probability of Just Noticeable Difference between Video Encoding Recipes

Just Noticeable Difference (JND) model developed based on Human Vision System (HVS) through subjective studies is valuable for many multimedia use cases. In the streaming industries, it is commonly applied to reach a good balance between compression efficiency and perceptual quality when selecting video encoding recipes. Nevertheless, recent state-of-the-art deep learning based JND prediction model relies on large-scale JND ground truth that is expensive and time consuming to collect. Most of the existing JND datasets contain limited number of contents and are limited to a certain codec (e.g., H264). As a result, JND prediction models that were trained on such datasets are normally not agnostic to the codecs. To this end, in order to decouple encoding recipes and JND estimation, we propose a novel framework to map the difference of objective Video Quality Assessment (VQA) scores, i.e., VMAF, between two given videos encoded with different encoding recipes from the same content to the probability of having just noticeable difference between them. The proposed probability mapping model learns from DCR test data, which is significantly cheaper compared to standard JND subjective test. As we utilize objective VQA metric (e.g., VMAF that trained with contents encoded with different codecs) as proxy to estimate JND, our model is agnostic to codecs and computationally efficient. Throughout extensive experiments, it is demonstrated that the proposed model is able to estimate JND values efficiently.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.