Paper detail

A Framework for the Optimal Selection for High-Throughput Data Collection Workflows by Autonomous Experimentation Systems

Autonomous experimentation systems have been used to greatly advance the integrated computational materials engineering (ICME) paradigm. This paper outlines a framework that enables the design and selection of data collection workflows for autonomous experimentation systems. The framework first searches for data collection workflows that generate high-quality information and then selects the workflow that generates the \emph{best, highest-value} information as per a user-defined objective. We employ this framework to select the \emph{user-defined best} high-throughput workflow for material characterization on an additively manufactured Ti-6Al-4V sample for the purposes of outlining a basic materials characterization scenario, reducing the collection time of backscattered electron scanning electron scanning electron microscopy images by a factor of 5 times as compared to the benchmark workflow for the case study presented, and by a factor of 85 times as compared to the workflow used in the previously published study.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.