Paper detail

A Framework for the Evaluation of Network Reliability Under Periodic Demand

In this paper, we study network reliability in relation to a periodic time-dependent utility function that reflects the system's functional performance. When an anomaly occurs, the system incurs a loss of utility that depends on the anomaly's timing and duration. We analyze the long-term average utility loss by considering exponential anomalies' inter-arrival times and general distributions of maintenance duration. We show that the expected utility loss converges in probability to a simple form. We then extend our convergence results to more general distributions of anomalies' inter-arrival times and to particular families of non-periodic utility functions. To validate our results, we use data gathered from a cellular network consisting of 660 base stations and serving over 20k users. We demonstrate the quasi-periodic nature of users' traffic and the exponential distribution of the anomalies' inter-arrival times, allowing us to apply our results and provide reliability scores for the network. We also discuss the convergence speed of the long-term average utility loss, the interplay between the different network's parameters, and the impact of non-stationarity on our convergence results.

preprint2023arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.