Paper detail

A Framework for Server Authentication using Communication Protocol Dialects

In today's world, computer networks have become vulnerable to numerous attacks. In both wireless and wired networks, one of the most common attacks is man-in-the-middle attacks, within which session hijacking, context confusion attacks have been the most attempted. A potential attacker may have enough time to launch an attack targeting these vulnerabilities (such as rerouting the target request to a malicious server or hijacking the traffic). A viable strategy to solve this problem is, by dynamically changing the system properties, configurations and create unique fingerprints to identify the source. However, the existing work of fingerprinting mainly focuses on lower-level properties (e.g IP address), and only these types of properties are restricted for mutation. We develop a novel system, called Verify-Pro, to provide server authentication using communication protocol dialects, that uses a client-server architecture based on network protocols for customizing the communication transactions. For each session, a particular sequence of handshakes will be used as dialects. So, given the context, with the establishment of a one-time username and password, we use the dialects as an authentication mechanism for each request (e.g get filename in FTP) throughout the session, which enforces continuous authentication. Specifically, we leverage a machine learning approach on both client and server machines to trigger a specific dialect that dynamically changes for each request. We implement a prototype of Verify-Pro and evaluate its practicality on standard communication protocols FTP, HTTP & internet of things protocol MQTT. Our experimental results show that by sending misleading information through message packets from an attacker at the application layer, it is possible for the recipient to identify if the sender is genuine or a spoofed one, with a negligible overhead of 0.536%.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.