Paper detail

A Framework for Partial Secrecy

We consider theoretical limits of partial secrecy in a setting where an eavesdropper attempts to causally reconstruct an information sequence with low distortion based on an intercepted transmission and the past of the sequence. The transmitter and receiver have limited secret key at their disposal but not enough to establish perfect secrecy with a one-time pad. From another viewpoint, the eavesdropper is acting as an adversary, competing in a zero-sum repeated game against the sender and receiver of the secrecy system. In this case, the information sequence represents a sequence of actions, and the distortion function captures the payoff of the game. We give an information theoretic region expressing the tradeoff between secret key rate and max-min distortion for the eavesdropper. We also simplify this characterization to a linear program. As an example, we discuss how to optimally use secret key to hide Bernoulli-p bits from an eavesdropper so that they incur maximal Hamming distortion.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.