Paper detail

A Four-Stokes-Parameter Spectral Line Polarimeter at the Caltech Submillimeter Observatory

We designed and built a new Four-Stokes-Parameter spectral line Polarimeter (FSPPol) for the Caltech Submillimeter Observatory (CSO). The simple design of FSPPol does not include any mirrors or optical components to redirect or re-image the radiation beam and simply transmits the beam to the receiver through its retarder plates. FSPPol is currently optimized for observation in the 200-260 GHz range and measures all four Stokes parameters, I, Q, U, and V. The very low level of instrument polarization makes it possible to obtain reliable measurements of the Goldreich-Kylafis effect in molecular spectral lines. Accordingly, we measured a polarization fraction of a few percent in the spectral line wings of ^{12}\mathrm{CO} (J=2\rightarrow1) in Orion KL/IRc2, which is consistent with previous observations. We also used FSPPol to study the Zeeman effect in the N=2\rightarrow1 transition of CN in DR21(OH) for the first time. At this point we cannot report a Zeeman detection, but more observations are ongoing.

preprint2010arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.