Paper detail

A flyby anomaly for Juno? Not from standard physics

An empirical formula recently appeared in the literature to explain the observed anomalies of about $Δ\dotρ\approx 1-10$ mm s$^{-1}$ in the geocentric range-rates $\dotρ$ of the Galileo, NEAR and Rosetta spacecraft at some of their past perigee passages along unbound, hyperbolic trajectories. It predicts an anomaly of the order of $6$ mm s$^{-1}$ for the recent flyby of Juno, occurred on 9 October 2013. Data analyses to confirm or disproof it are currently ongoing. We numerically calculate the impact on the geocentric Juno's range rate of some classical and general relativistic dynamical effects which are either unmodelled or mismodelled to a certain level in the software used to process the data. They are: a) The first even zonal harmonic coefficient $J_2$ of the multipolar expansion of the terrestrial gravitational potential causing orbital perturbations both at the $\left.{\rm a}^{'}\right)$ Newtonian ($J_2$) and at the $\left. {\rm a}^{''}\right)$ first post-Newtonian level ($J_2 c^{-2}$) b) The post-Newtonian gravitoelectric (GE) Schwarschild-like component of the Earth's gravitational field c) The post-Newtonian gravitomagnetic (GM) Lense-Thirring effect. The magnitudes of their mismodeled and nominal range-rate signatures are: $\left. {\rm a}^{'}\right)$ $Δ\dotρ_{σ_{J_2}} \approx 1$ $μ$m s$^{-1}$ $\left. {\rm a}^{''}\right)$ $Δ\dotρ_{J_2 c^{-2}} \approx 0.015$ $μ$m s$^{-1}$ b) $Δ\dotρ_{\rm GE} \approx 25$ $μ$m s$^{-1}$ c) $Δ\dotρ_{\rm GM} \approx 0.05$ $μ$m s$^{-1}$. If a flyby anomaly as large as a few mm s$^{-1}$ will be finally found also for Juno, it will not be due to any of these standard gravitational effects. (Abridged)

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.