Paper detail

A Fluid-Dynamical Subgrid Scale Model for Highly Compressible Astrophysical Turbulence

We formulate and implement the Euler equations with SGS dynamics and provide numerical tests of an SGS turbulence energy model that predicts the turbulent pressure of unresolved velocity fluctuations and the rate of dissipation for highly compressible turbulence. We test closures for the turbulence energy cascade by filtering data from high-resolution simulations of forced isothermal and adiabatic turbulence. Optimal properties and an excellent correlation are found for a linear combination of the eddy-viscosity closure that is employed in LES of weakly compressible turbulence and a term that is non-linear in the Jacobian matrix of the velocity. Using this mixed closure, the SGS turbulence energy model is validated in LES of turbulence with stochastic forcing. It is found that the SGS model satisfies several important requirements: 1. The mean SGS turbulence energy follows a power law for varying grid scale. 2. The root mean square (RMS) Mach number of the unresolved velocity fluctuations is proportional to the RMS Mach number of the resolved turbulence, independent of the forcing. 3. The rate of dissipation and the turbulence energy flux are constant. Moreover, we discuss difficulties with direct estimates of the turbulent pressure and the dissipation rate on the basis of resolved flow quantities that have recently been proposed. In combination with the energy injection by stellar feedback and other unresolved processes, the proposed SGS model is applicable to a variety of problems in computational astrophysics. Computing the SGS turbulence energy, the treatment of star formation and stellar feedback in galaxy simulations can be improved. Further, we expect that the turbulent pressure on the grid scale affects the stability of gas against gravitational collapse.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.