Paper detail

A First-Principles Study on the Adsorption of Small Molecules on Arsenene: Comparison of Oxidation Kinetics in Arsenene, Antimonene, Phosphorene and InSe

Arsenene, a new group V two-dimensional (2D) semiconducting material beyond phosphorene and antimonene, has recently gained an increasing attention owning to its various interesting properties which can be altered or intentionally functionalized by chemical reactions with various molecules. This work provides a systematic study on the interactions of arsenene with the small molecules, including H2, NH3, O2, H2O, NO, and NO2. It is predicted that O2, H2O, NO, and NO2 are strong acceptors, while NH3 serves as a donor. Importantly, it is shown a negligible charge transfer between H2 and arsenene which is ten times lower than that between H2 and phosphorene and about thousand times lower than that between H2 and InSe and antimonene. The calculated energy barrier for O2 splitting on arsenene is found to be as low as 0.67 eV. Thus, pristine arsenene may easily oxidize in ambient conditions as other group V 2D materials. On the other hand, the acceptor role of H2O on arsenene, similarly to the cases of antimonene and InSe, may help to prevent the proton transfer between H2O and O species by forming acids, which suppresses further structural degradation of arsenene. The structural decomposition of the 2D layers upon interaction with the environment may be avoided due to the acceptor role of H2O molecules as the study predicts from the comparison of common group V 2D materials. However, the protection for arsenene is still required due to its strong interaction with other small environmental molecules. The present work renders the possible ways to protect arsenene from structure degradation and to modulate its electronic properties, which is useful for the material synthesis, storage and applications.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.