Paper detail

A first look at the performances of a Bayesian chart to monitor the ratio of two Weibull percentiles

The aim of the present work is to investigate the performances of a specific Bayesian control chart used to compare two processes. The chart monitors the ratio of the percentiles of a key characteristic associated with the processes. The variability of such a characteristic is modeled via the Weibull distribution and a practical Bayesian approach to deal with Weibull data is adopted. The percentiles of the two monitored processes are assumed to be independent random variables. The Weibull distributions of the key characteristic of both processes are assumed to have the same and stable shape parameter. This is usually experienced in practice because the Weibull shape parameter is related to the main involved factor of variability. However, if a change of the shape parameters of the processes is suspected, the involved distributions can be used to monitor their stability. We first tested the effects of the number of the training data on the responsiveness of the chart. Then we tested the robustness of the chart in spite of very poor prior information. To this end, the prior values were changed to reflect a 50% shift in both directions from the original values of the shape parameter and the percentiles of the two monitored processes. Finally, various combinations of shifts were considered for the sampling distributions after the Phase I, with the purpose of estimating the diagnostic ability of the charts to signal an out-of-control state. The traditional approach based on the Average Run Length, empirically computed via a Monte Carlo simulation, was adopted.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.