Paper detail

A First Look at Galaxy Flyby Interactions. II. Do Flybys matter?

In the second paper of this series, we present results from cosmological simulations on the demographics of flyby interactions to gauge their potential impact on galaxy evolution. In a previous paper, we demonstrated that flybys -- an interaction where two independent halos inter-penetrate but detach at a later time and do not merge -- occur much more frequently than previously believed. In particular, we found that the frequency of flybys increases at low redshift and is comparable to or even greater than the frequency of mergers for halos $\gtrsim 10^{11} M_\odot/h$. In this paper, we classify flybys according to their orbits and the level of perturbation exacted on both the halos involved. We find that the majority of flybys penetrate deeper than $\sim R_{half}$ of the primary and have an initial relative speed $\sim 1.6\times V_{vir}$ of the primary. The typical flyby mass-ratio is $\sim 0.1$ at high $z$ for all halos, while at low $z$, massive primary halos undergo flybys with small secondary halos. We estimate the perturbation from the flyby on both the primary and the secondary and find that a typical flyby is mostly non-perturbative for the primary halo. However, since a massive primary experiences so many flybys at any given time, they are nearly continually a victim of a perturbative event. In particular, we find flybys that cause $\sim 1\%$ change in the binding energy of a primary halo occurs $\gtrsim 1 $ Gyr$^{-1}$ for halos $> 10^{10} M_\odot/h$ for $z \lesssim 4$. Secondary halos, on the other hand, are highly perturbed by the typical encounter, experiencing a change in binding energy of nearly order unity. Our results imply that flybys can drive a significant part of galaxy transformation at moderate to lower redshifts ($z \lesssim 4$). We touch on implications for observational surveys, mass-to-light ratios, and galaxy assembly bias.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.