Paper detail

A filamentary cascade model of the inertial range

This paper develops a simple model of the inertial range of turbulent flow, based on a cascade of vortical filaments. A binary branching structure is proposed, involving the splitting of filaments at each step into pairs of daughter filaments with differing properties, in effect two distinct simultaneous cascades. Neither of these cascades has the Richardson-Kolmogorov exponent of 1/3. This bimodal structure is also different from bifractal models as vorticity volume is conserved. If cascades are assumed to be initiated continuously and throughout space we obtain a model of the inertial range of stationary turbulence. We impose the constraint associated with Kolmogorov's four-fifths law and then adjust the splitting to achieve good agreement with the observed structure exponents $ζ_p$. The presence of two elements to the cascade is responsible for the nonlinear dependence of $ζ_p$ upon $p$. A single cascade provides a model for the initial-value problem of the Navier--Stokes equations in the limit of vanishing viscosity. To simulate this limit we let the cascade continue indefinitely, energy removal occurring in the limit. We are thus able to compute the decay of energy in the model.

preprint2019arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.