Paper detail

A feasible roadmap to identifying significant intercellular genomic heterogeneity in deep sequencing data

Intercellular heterogeneity serves as both a confounding factor in studying individual clones and an information source in characterizing any heterogeneous tissues, such as blood, tumor systems. Due to inevitable sequencing errors and other sample preparation artifacts such as PCR errors, systematic efforts to characterize intercellular genomic heterogeneity must effectively distinguish genuine clonal sequences from fake derivatives. We developed a novel approach (SIGH) for identifying significant genuine clonal sequences directly from mixed sequencing reads that can improve genomic analyses in many biological contexts. This method offers several attractive features: (1) it automatically estimates the error rate from raw sequence reads and identifies genuine clonal sequences; (2) it is robust to the large variety of error rate due to the various experimental conditions; (3) it is supported by a well grounded statistical framework that exploits probabilistic characteristics of sequencing errors; (4) its unbiased strategy allows detecting rare clone(s) despite that clone relative abundance; and (5) it estimates constituent proportions in each sample. Extensive realistic simulation studies show that our method can reliably estimate the error rates and faithfully distinguish the genuine clones from fake derivatives, paving the way for follow up analysis that is otherwise ruined by the often dominant fake clones.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.