Paper detail

A Favard type theorem for orthogonal polynomials on the unit circle from a three term recurrence formula

The objective of this manuscript is to study directly the Favard type theorem associated with the three term recurrence formula % \[ R_{n+1}(z) = \big[(1+ic_{n+1})z+(1-ic_{n+1})\big] R_{n}(z) - 4 d_{n+1} z R_{n-1}(z), \quad n \geq 1, \] % with $R_{0}(z) =1$ and $R_{1}(z) = (1+ic_{1})z+(1-ic_{1})$, where $\{c_n\}_{n=1}^{\infty}$ is a real sequence and $\{d_n\}_{n=1}^{\infty}$ is a positive chain sequence. We establish that there exists an unique nontrivial probability measure $μ$ on the unit circle for which $\{R_n(z) - 2(1-m_n)R_{n-1}(z)\}$ gives the sequence of orthogonal polynomials. Here, $\{m_n\}_{n=0}^{\infty}$ is the minimal parameter sequence of the positive chain sequence $\{d_n\}_{n=1}^{\infty}$. The element $d_1$ of the chain sequence, which does not effect the polynomials $R_n$, has an influence in the derived probability measure $μ$ and hence, in the associated orthogonal polynomials on the unit circle. To be precise, if $\{M_n\}_{n=0}^{\infty}$ is the maximal parameter sequence of the chain sequence, then the measure $μ$ is such that $M_0$ is the size of its mass at $z=1$. An example is also provided to completely illustrates the results obtained.

preprint2013arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.