Paper detail

A Far-IR Characterization of 24 micron Selected Galaxies at 0<z<2.5 using Stacking at 70 microns and 160 microns in the COSMOS Field

We present a study of the average properties of luminous infrared galaxies detected directly at 24 $μ$m in the COSMOS field using a median stacking analysis at 70$μ$m and 160 $μ$m. Over 35000 sources spanning 0<z<3 and 0.06 mJy<S_{24}<3.0 mJy are stacked, divided into bins of both photometric redshift and 24 $μ$m flux. We find no correlation of $S_{70}/S_{24}$ flux density ratio with $S_{24}$, but find that galaxies with higher $S_{24}$ have a lower $S_{160}/S_{24}$ flux density ratio. These observed ratios suggest that 24 $μ$m selected galaxies have warmer SEDs at higher mid-IR fluxes, and therefore have a possible higher fraction of AGN. Comparisons of the average $S_{70}/S_{24}$ and $S_{160}/S_{24}$ colors with various empirical templates and theoretical models show that the galaxies detected at 24 $μ$m are consistent with &#34;normal&#34; star-forming galaxies and warm mid-IR galaxies such as Mrk 231, but inconsistent with heavily obscured galaxies such as Arp 220. We perform a $χ^{2}$ analysis to determine best fit galactic model SEDs and total IR luminosities for each of our bins. We compare our results to previous methods of estimating $L_{\rm{IR}}$ and find that previous methods show considerable agreement over the full redshift range, except for the brightest $S_{24}$ sources, where previous methods overpredict the bolometric IR luminosity at high redshift, most likely due to their warmer dust SED. We present a table that can be used as a more accurate and robust method for estimating bolometric infrared luminosity from 24 $μ$m flux densities.

preprint2010arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.