Paper detail

A Fair, Traceable, Auditable and Participatory Randomization Tool for Legal Systems

Many real-world scenarios require the random selection of one or more individuals from a pool of eligible candidates. One example of especial social relevance refers to the legal system, in which the jurors and judges are commonly picked according to some probability distribution aiming to avoid biased decisions. In this scenario, ensuring auditability of the random drawing procedure is imperative to promote confidence in its fairness. With this goal in mind, this article describes a protocol for random drawings specially designed for use in legal systems. The proposed design combines the following properties: security by design, ensuring the fairness of the random draw as long as at least one participant behaves honestly; auditability by any interested party, even those having no technical background, using only public information; and statistical robustness, supporting drawings where candidates may have distinct probability distributions. Moreover, it is capable of inviting and engaging as participating stakeholders the main interested parties of a legal process, in a way that promotes process transparency, public trust and institutional resilience. An open-source implementation is also provided as supplementary material.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.