Paper detail

A.E.C. with not too many models

Consider an a.e.c. (abstract elementary class), that is, a class K of models with a partial order refining inclusion (submodel) which satisfy the most basic properties of an elementary class. Our test question is trying to show that the function dot I (lambda, K), counting the number of models in K of cardinality lambda up to isomorphism, is "nice", not chaotic, even without assuming it is sometimes 1, i.e. categorical in some lambda's. We prove here that for some closed unbounded class C of cardinals we have (a), (b) or (c) where (a) for every lambda in C of cofinality aleph_0, dot I (lambda, K) greater than or equal to lambda, (b) for every lambda in C of cofinality aleph_0 and M belongs to K_lambda, for every cardinal kappa greater than or equal to lambda there is N_kappa of cardinality kappa extending M (in the sense of our a.e.c.), (c) mathfrak k is bounded; that is, dot I (lambda, K) = 0 for every lambda large enough (equivalently lambda greater than or equal to beth_{delta_*} where delta_* = (2^{LST(mathfrak k)})^+). Recall that an important difference of non-elementary classes from the elementary case is the possibility of having models in K, even of large cardinality, which are maximal, or just failing clause (b).

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.