Paper detail

A Dynamical Survey of Stellar-Mass Black Holes in 50 Milky Way Globular Clusters

Recent numerical simulations of globular clusters (GCs) have shown that stellar-mass black holes (BHs) play a fundamental role in driving cluster evolution and shaping their present-day structure. Rapidly mass-segregating to the center of GCs, BHs act as a dynamical energy source via repeated super-elastic scattering, delaying onset of core collapse and limiting mass segregation for visible stars. While recent discoveries of BH candidates in Galactic and extragalactic GCs have further piqued interest in BH-mediated cluster dynamics, numerical models show that even if significant BH populations remain in today's GCs, they are typically in configurations that are not directly detectable. We demonstrated in Weatherford et al. (2018) that an anti-correlation between a suitable measure of mass segregation ($Δ$) in observable stellar populations and the number of retained BHs in GC models can be applied to indirectly probe BH populations in real GCs. Here, we estimate the number and total mass of BHs presently retained in 50 Milky Way GCs from the ACS Globular Cluster Survey by measuring $Δ$ between populations of main sequence stars, using correlations found between $Δ$ and BH retention in the CMC Cluster Catalog models. We demonstrate that the range in $Δ$'s distribution from our models matches that for observed GCs to a remarkable degree. Our results further provide the narrowest constraints to-date on the retained BH populations in the GCs analyzed. Of these 50 GCs, we identify NGCs 2808, 5927, 5986, 6101, and 6205 to presently contain especially large BH populations, each with total BH mass exceeding $10^3\,\rm{M_{\odot}}$.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.