Paper detail

A dynamic program to achieve capacity of multiple access channel with noiseless feedback

In this paper, we consider the problem of evaluating capacity expression of a multiple access channel (MAC) with noiseless feedback. So far, the capacity expression for this channel is known through a multi letter directed information by Kramer [1]. Recently, it was shown in [2] that one can pose it as a dynamic optimization problem, however, no dynamic program was provided as the authors claimed there is no notion of state that is observed by both the senders. In this paper, we build upon [2] to show that there indeed exists a state and therefore a dynamic program (DP) that decomposes this dynamic optimization problem, and equivalently a Bellman fixed-point equation to evaluate capacity of this channel. We do so by defining a common belief on private messages and private beliefs of the two senders, and using this common belief as state of the system. We further show that this DP can be further reduced to a DP with state as the common belief on just the messages. This provides a single letter characterization of the capacity of this channel.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.