Paper detail

A Dynamic Model of Cascades on Random Networks with a Threshold Rule

Cascades on random networks are typically analyzed by assuming they map onto percolation processes and then are solved using generating function formulations. This approach assumes that the network is infinite and weakly connected, yet furthermore approximates a dynamic cascading process as a static percolation event. In this paper we propose a dynamic Markov model formulation that assumes a finite network with arbitrary average nodal degree. We apply it to the case where cascades follow a threshold rule, that is, that a node will change state ("flip") only if a fraction, exceeding a given threshold, of its neighbors has changed state previously. The corresponding state transition matrix, recalculated after each step, records the probability that a node of degree k has i flipped neighbors after j steps in the cascade's evolution. This theoretical model reproduces a number of behaviors observed in simulations but not yet reported in the literature. These include the ability to predict cascades in a domain previously predicted to forbid cascades without assuming that the network is locally tree-like, and, due to the dynamic nature of the model, a "near death" behavior in which cascades initially appear about to die but later explode. Cascades in the "no cascades" region require a sufficiently large seed of initially flipped nodes whose size scales with the size of the network or else the cascade will die out. Our theory also predicts the well known properties of cascades, for instance that a single node seed can start a global cascade in the appropriate regime regardless of the (finite) size of the network. The theory and simulations developed here are compared with a foundational paper by Watts which used generating function theory.

preprint2009arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.