Paper detail

A dynamic intermediate state limits the folding rate of a discontinuous two-domain protein

Protein folding is an indispensable process for the majority of proteins after their synthesis from ribosomes in the cell. Most in vitro protein folding studies have focused on single-domain proteins. Hence, it is important to understand the folding process of multi-domain proteins, especially when domains are discontinuous. We choose the Maltose binding protein (MBP) as a model system. In particular, we studied a mutant of MBP that folds slowly. Here, using two- and three-color single-molecule Foerster resonance energy transfer (smFRET) experiments, we study the refolding of both the domains and the interaction between the domains of DM-MBP. Initial two-color smFRET measurements of the N-terminal domain (NTD) reveal the presence of a folding intermediate. The same folding intermediate is observed in measurements monitoring the C- terminal domain (CTD) and the NTD-CTD (N-C) interface. The refolding intermediate is dynamic on the sub-millisecond timescale. Quantitative analysis on underlying dynamic interconversions revealed a delay in NTD folding imposed by the entropic barrier being the primary cause for slow DM-MBP folding. Moreover, CTD folds after NTD completes the folding. Using three-color smFRET, we could show the NTD folds first and CTD later in a same protein. Molecular dynamic simulations for temperature-induced unfolding on WT- and DM-MBP identify a folding nucleus in the NTD, which is rich in hydrophobic residues, and explains why the two mutations slow down the folding kinetics. In the presence of the bacterial Hsp60 chaperonin system GroEL/ES, we observe that DM-MBP is dynamic within the chaperonin cavity but the chaperonin limits the conformational space of substrate. Hence, confinement aids DM-MBP in overcoming the entropic barrier. The study reports on the subtle tuning and co-dependency for protein folding between two-domains with a discontinuous arrangement.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.