Paper detail

A dwarf galaxy's transformation and a massive galaxy's edge: autopsy of kill and killer in NGC 1097

(abridged) We present a dynamical analysis of the extended stellar stream encircling NGC 1097. Within a statistical framework, we model its surface brightness using mock streams as in Amorisco (2015) and deep imaging data from the CHART32 telescope (Stellar Tidal Stream Survey). We reconstruct the post-infall evolution of the progenitor, which has experienced 3 pericentric passages and lost more than 2 orders of magnitude in mass. At infall, $5.4\pm0.6$ Gyr ago, the progenitor was a disky dwarf with mass of $\log_{10}[m(<3.4\pm1 {\rm kpc})/ M_\odot]=10.35\pm0.25$. We illustrate how the 90$^\circ$ turn in the stream, identifying the `dog leg', is the signature of the progenitor's prograde rotation. Today, the remnant is a nucleated dwarf, with a LOS velocity of $v_{\rm p, los}^{\rm obs}=-30\pm 30$ kms$^{-1}$, and a luminosity of $3.3\times 10^7 L_{V,\odot}$ (Galianni et al. 2010). Our independent analysis predicts $v_{\rm p, los}=-51^{-17}_{+14}$ kms$^{-1}$, and measures $\log_{10}(m/ M_\odot)=7.4^{+0.6}_{-0.8}$, so that the compact nucleus is soon becoming a low-luminosity UCD. We find that NGC 1097 has a mass of $M_{200}=1.8^{+0.5}_{-0.4} \times 10^{12}\; M_{\odot}$, and its concentration $c_{200}=6.7^{+2.4}_{-1.3}$ is in agreement with LCDM. The stream is described almost down to the noise in a spherical host potential, we find this would not be possible if the halo was substantially triaxial at large radii. Its morphology shows that the slope of the total density profile bends from an inner $γ(r_{\rm peri})=1.5\pm0.15$. The progenitor's orbit reaches $r_{\rm apo}=150\pm 15$ kpc, more than a half of the virial radius of the host, so that, for the first time on an individual extragalactic halo, we measure the outer density slope, $γ(0.6r_{200,c})=3.9\pm0.5$. This demonstrates the promise of the newborn field of detailed, statistical modelling of extragalactic tidal streams.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.